Artificial intelligence and universal design for learning in teacher education
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; universal design for learning; teacher education; inclusive education; learning to learn.Abstract
Initial teacher education faces the challenge of integrating artificial intelligence as a pedagogical resource that fosters inclusive and autonomous learning. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a teaching methodology based on Universal Design for Learning, supported by the use of artificial intelligence virtual assistants (ChatGPT and DeepSeek), implemented in a digital technologies course for pre-service preschool teachers. The methodology promoted self-management of knowledge and culminated in the creation of an educational website as an integrative evidence. Forty-six students participated, responding to an 11-point Likert-scale questionnaire that assessed five dimensions: methodological management, digital competencies, educational inclusion, valuation of the integrative evidence, and overall satisfaction. Results showed positive evaluations across all dimensions, particularly highlighting the development of digital competencies (M = 9.30, SD = 0.95) and the promotion of inclusive environments (M = 9.17, SD = 1.17). The integrative evidence was valued as relevant for professional practice (M = 9.22). The instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .93; ω = .94). It is concluded that the intentional incorporation of artificial intelligence, articulated through Universal Design for Learning, significantly contributes to the development of digital and pedagogical competencies in initial teacher education, positioning AI as a mediating resource for inclusive and autonomous learning.
Downloads
References
Adoumieh-Coconas, N., Alvarado-Bordas, S., & Acosta-Caba, L. (2026). Integración de la inteligencia artificial en propuestas didácticas para un aprendizaje inclusivo en la enseñanza de la lengua. AULA Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.33413/aulahcs.2026.72i1.418
Alcolea, M. d. P., & Formella, Z. (2024). Effective teacher and effective teaching practices: literature perspective and learning experience. Qualitative study between Italy and Spain. Forum Pedagogiczne,
Bellei, C. (2022). Mejoramiento e innovación escolar:¿ Cómo cambiar efectivamente la enseñanza y el aprendizaje? Foro Regional de Política Educativa, https://intranet.ciae.cl/uploads/resources/630/00_1704211891.pdf
Caena, F., & Stringher, C. (2020). Hacia una nueva conceptualización del Aprender a Aprender. Aula abierta, 49(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.49.3.2020.199-206
Canto, Á. G., Sosa, W. E., Bautista, J., Escobar, J., & Santillán, A. (2020). Escala de Likert: Una alternativa para elaborar e interpretar un instrumento de percepción social. Revista de la alta tecnología y sociedad, 12(1). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55564587e4b0d1d3fb1eda6b/t/5ffe0063b15beb25b917bec1/1610481763900/06+CantodeGante+ATS+V12N1+38-45.pdf
CAST. (2024). Directrices de Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje de CAST versión 3.0. Retrieved 27 de febrero from https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Coll, C., & Monereo, C. (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Ediciones Morata.
Conner, J., Mitra, D. L., Holquist, S. E., & Boat, A. (2025). How teachers’ student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators. Journal of Educational Change, 26(1), 89-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09513-0
Conner, J. O. (2022). Educators’ experiences with student voice: How teachers understand, solicit, and use student voice in their classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 28(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.2016689
Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 896-901. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72720458
Franco, D., Pérez, N., Torres, J., Veiga, N., & Otero, L. (2022). Competencias del siglo XXI: autopercepción versus desarrollo real en estudiantes de bachillerato y estrategias didácticas con apalancamiento digital para promover su desarrollo.
González, J. L., & Estrella, J. P. (2023). Educación del Siglo XXI, competencias, metodologías y estrategias. Esprint Investigación, 2(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v2i1.50
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication methods and measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2023). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mcgraw-Hill Interamericana S.A.
Hernández, O. (2021). Aproximación a los distintos tipos de muestreo no probabilístico que existen. Revista Cubana de medicina general integral, 37(3). http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/mgi/v37n3/1561-3038-mgi-37-03-e1442.pdf
Holmes, W., & Miao, F. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Unesco Publishing.
Klimenko, O., Hernández Flórez, N. E., Carmona Carmona, P., Mesa Herrera, J. A., & Patiño
Parra, J. G. (2024, septiembre-diciembre). Riesgo de adicción a redes sociales e internet,
habilidades sociales y bienestar psicológico en estudiantes de básica secundaria. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (73), 38-71. https://www.doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n73a3
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 62627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Lima-Leonardo, M. d. G., Morelo-Pereira, M., Valentini, F., Pinto-Pizarro, C., & Steger, M. F. (2022). Assessing the Influence of Reversed Items and Force-Choice on the Work and Meaning Inventory [Evaluación de la influencia de los ítems invertidos y de elección forzosa en el Inventario de trabajo significativo]. Acción Psicológica, 17(1), 103–116-103–116. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.17.1.27330
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mitra, D., Al Saghir, G., Conner, J., Holquist, S. E., & Wright, N. L. (2025). Encouraging Teacher Readiness for Designing Student Voice Practices. Teachers College Record, 127(4), 144-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681251355705
Mora, A. M., Silva, J. M., Bustamante, M. S., & Figueroa, R. K. (2022). Métodos y estrategias didácticas: Un aprendizaje recíproco en el siglo XXI. Journal of Science and Research, 7(3), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7374346
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Parr, J., & Hawe, E. (2022). Student pedagogic voice in the literacy classroom: A review. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 773-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864769
Pazos-Alfonso, J. C., Toro-Moreno, A. C., & Hernández-Flórez, J. A. (2026). Virtual Reality-Enhanced Neurofeedback: Training Mechanisms, System Components, and Prospects for Cognitive and Neural Rehabilitation. Nexus: Multidisciplinary Research Journal (MIR), 3(5), 83-92. https://nexushouseeditorial.com/index.php/nexus/article/view/103
Pere, F., Morales-Vives, F., Casas, J. M., & Muñiz, J. (2025). Likert Scales: A Practical Guide to Design, Construction and Use. Psicothema, 37(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.24
Proffitt, W. A., Mccall, Z., Rath, S., & Matusevich, H. A. (2025). Trust the experts: Advancing student voice in special education teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159, 105002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105002
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
Rivera, M. T., Guajardo, J. M., Macías, E. H., & Molina, A. (2022). Percepción del ejercicio docente universitario: Perception of university teacher practice. Revista Relep–Educación y Pedagogía en Latinoamérica, 4(1), 71-85. http://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/643/6432975006/
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). El uso de ítems inversos en las escalas tipo Likert: una práctica cuestionable. Psicothema, 30(2), 149-158. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/16886
Suárez, N., Cáceres, M. L., Gómez, V., & Pérez, I. C. (2022). Evaluación docente y desarrollo profesional universitario: una revisión basada en los participantes, las dimensiones y los métodos. PUBLICACIONES, 52(3), 139-189. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v52i3.22271
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Torralbas, J. E. (2022). Indicadores para evaluar cohesión grupal en grupos escolares con el empleo de la técnica sociométrica. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(3), 111-122. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rus/v14n3/2218-3620-rus-14-03-111.pdf
Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/773/77349627039/html/
Zambrana, R., Salinas, A. D., Macías, F. A., & Escobar, E. E. (2026). Inteligencia artificial en la educación superior para promover un aprendizaje personalizado e inclusivo: una revisión sistemática. Revista InveCom, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16147008
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
At Nexus House Editorial, we ensure the long-term preservation of all published articles through reliable and up-to-date technological strategies. Our journal is part of the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), an international network that guarantees the integrity and continuous access of content through a distributed backup system. We also perform regular internal backups, which strengthens the protection and availability of digital files. Thanks to these actions, even in scenarios where the journal or publisher ceases operations, the content will remain accessible to researchers and readers around the world.Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Received: 2026-02-16
Accepted: 2026-02-28
Published: 2026-03-08
