Policy on Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct

At Nexus House Editorial, we are fully committed to upholding academic integrity throughout our publishing process. Any allegation of research misconduct will be addressed seriously and in accordance with transparent and structured procedures.

1. Definition of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct involves behaviors that compromise the credibility and reliability of scholarly work. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Plagiarism: Unauthorized use of ideas, data, or text without proper attribution.

  • Falsification: Intentional manipulation of data or results to mislead.

  • Fabrication: Creation of data or findings that are entirely fictional.

  • Duplication: Republishing the same work in multiple venues without clear disclosure.

  • Copyright Infringement: Unauthorized use of copyrighted material.

2. Submitting a Misconduct Allegation

To report a case of research misconduct, individuals must send a written statement to editor@nexushouse.org, including:

  • Full name and contact details of the complainant.

  • A detailed description of the alleged misconduct and the work involved.

  • Supporting documents or evidence.

We encourage reporting as soon as the suspected misconduct becomes known.

3. Initial Assessment

Upon receipt, the editorial team will conduct a preliminary review to determine whether the allegation warrants further investigation:

  • Evidence Review: Submitted materials will be examined to assess the legitimacy of the complaint.

  • Confidentiality: All information will be handled with care and discretion to protect the identities of those involved.

4. Investigation Process

If sufficient grounds are found, a formal investigation will be launched:

  • Investigative Committee: A dedicated panel, including editorial board members and, if necessary, external experts, will be assembled.

  • Fairness: The process will be objective, allowing all parties to present their perspectives and evidence.

  • Documentation: The entire investigation will be recorded for transparency and accountability.

5. Outcome and Actions

Upon conclusion of the investigation, the parties involved will be informed:

  • Decision Notification: Both complainant and accused will receive a formal explanation of the final decision.

  • Corrective Measures: If misconduct is confirmed, possible actions may include:

    • Retraction of the article.

    • Issuance of corrections or clarifications.

    • Notification of relevant institutions.

    • Editorial sanctions based on the severity of the case.

6. Appeals

If either party disagrees with the outcome, an appeal can be submitted:

  • Submission: Appeals must be filed in writing within 15 business days of the decision notification.

  • Independent Review: A separate panel will review the appeal to ensure neutrality and fairness.

7. Commitment to Research Integrity

Nexus House Editorial reaffirms its dedication to ethical publishing. We aim to maintain a professional, transparent, and rigorous academic environment, addressing any allegations of misconduct with diligence and responsibility.